"iPeace was offered to Gordon for free" he refused writes David

I think it would be only right to know that Gordon wrote that iPeace was David's baby and that all David would have to do was to comunicate with us, something David hadn't done enough of. We surely could have found a way to keep this on its feet, but David, you never comunicated with us enough to work out any problems. (it's the truth, and you know it)

0 members like this

Comment

You need to be a member of iPeace.us to add comments!

Join iPeace.us

Comment by Leah D (Pixie) on June 2, 2010 at 11:16pm: Thank U Steph,
For continuing to BLOG..all the way to the end..HERE and now onwards..to the New!
I agree with ALL Paul & myron replied. Sorry ,no time write more. Hugs x

Comment by Paul RETI on June 1, 2010 at 9:12am: Lack of effective communication is always an issue. Basic decisions have been made and communicated now. There is no value in playing the blame game.

It is good that some of the site is back.

It is a pity that the discussion forums have now vanished. Who is prepared to do and what to continue iPeace can and should be discussed openly somewhere.

Comment by myron joshua on May 31, 2010 at 11:04pm: Perhaps David has outgrown this "baby". Perhaps this baby has outgrown David, or grown up in what David thinks is the "wrong direction".

If David wants out, it is his prerogative.

Gordon has every right to refuse..but i think we need to let it be clear that we believe Ipeace has its own merit independent of its being the "baby" of David. David, as creator and developer of this group is to be commended and appreciated. But the group can have a life of its own.