Anybody notice this? The controversial ‘Climate Change’ bill, H.R. 2454 apparently was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on Friday, June 26 without much coverage because the media was all over the Michael Jackson story. This bill is also called the ‘The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (ACES)’ or more commonly know as ‘the cap and trade’ bill which aims to lower carbon emissions that supposedly warms up the globe. But according to a recent study by NASA, the solar cycle is responsible for the earth’s warming. Not man! So when the earth starts cooling down, they conveniently change the buzzword ‘global warming’ to ‘climate change’ so as to continue the propaganda!

According to Michael Fox, a retired nuclear scientist from the University of Idaho, he said that global warming is not accelerating but that these kinds of temperatures cycle up and down and have been doing so for millions of years. His comment backs up NASA’s solar cycle study mentioned earlier. He further said that there is little evidence to believe that man-made carbon dioxide is causing temperature fluctuation. "It's silly to lay it all on man-made carbon dioxide," said Fox. "It was El Nino in 1998 that caused the big spike in global warming and little to do with carbon dioxide." Other factors, including sun spots, solar winds, variations in the solar magnetic field and solar irradiation, could all be affecting temperature changes, he added.

Bob Carter, a research fellow at James Cook University said that “cutting carbon dioxide emissions, be it in Australia or worldwide, will likely result in no measurable change in future climate, because extra increments of atmospheric CO2 cause diminishing warming for each unit of increase; at most, a few tenths of a degree of extra warming would result from a completion of doubling of CO2 since pre-industrial times." In other words, cutting down carbon emissions would really make no difference at all!

So it’s clear that ‘climate change’ is all just an elaborate hoax aimed to create fear in people and deceive them into giving in to ‘climate’ legislation or the ‘cap-and-trade’ bill. This bill would actually impose taxes on carbon emissions thereby increasing what you already pay. It would regulate how people would heat, cool, and light their homes. If their houses don’t conform to the ‘green’ code, they supposedly have to make home improvements thereby spending more! Everything will be regulated like the car you drive and the things you use, all of which would incur some form of carbon tax. Companies would have to conform to ‘green’ standards and in the process making it more expensive. These expenses would most likely be passed down the line for everyone to pay in the guise to ‘go green’ which is based on a lie!

Rep. Michelle Bachmann aptly said it before the Friday voting that “because of this underlying bill, the federal government will virtually have control over every aspect of lives for the American people.” Bachmann actually equated the bill to ‘Tyranny’ and challenged the House, “It is time to stand up and say, ‘We get to choose… we choose liberty or we choose tyranny. It’s one of the two.”

“It’s our choice,” concluded Bachmann. “Will we choose liberty or we will choose tyranny?” Sadly, the bill got passed by a 219-212 vote but those who voted for the bill can still change their vote by July 2! This all depends on the people who call their lawmakers in the U.S. to express their disapproval. But if this goes through to the Senate for debate, Obama will now push for this fraud-based ‘climate change’ bill to be approved. If passed into law, this would eventually control and regulate every aspect of American lives as well fast-track the globalist’s ‘green’ agenda on the world stage. Obama is set to go to the International summit in Denmark, Copenhagen to discuss this agenda which is all aimed in the long run to tax and control the world’s people in the guise of ‘climate change’!

Let’s all be made aware of this pressing issue that’s based on a lie and to inform others as well no matter how and no matter what because ultimately, this affects us all in the way we live.

Cap and Tr8tors Can Change Vote by July 2 Deadline!

NASA Study Acknowledges Solar Cycle, Not Man, Responsible for Past Warming

Manmade Climate-Change Hoax

Scientists Call AP Report on Global Warming 'Hysteria',2933,468084,00.html

Minchin denies climate change man-made

Bachmann: Reject climate change bill as ‘tyranny’

Obama pushes Senate to act on climate measure

New World Order Rams Through Sham Cap & Trade Bill

Ron Paul: Global Warming Petition Signed by 31,478 Scientists


Views: 157

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion this retard can educate anyone,hmmm ?? unless already have a head full of idiocy.
"The Sydney Morning Herald"
* 5:13AM Sat February 13, 2010

February 2, 2010

Climate sceptic clouds the weather issue

A NASA satellite that would have measured atmospheric carbon dioxide with unprecedented accuracy fell into the Indian Ocean in February last year.

NASA said the crash was ''extremely disappointing''. Viscount Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, dubbed the ''high priest of climate sceptics'', doubts the space agency meant it.

''Not greatly to my surprise - indeed I predicted it - the satellite crashed on take-off because the last thing they want is real world hard data,'' he told a climate sceptics' lunch in South Yarra yesterday.

NASA understood that getting the satellite into orbit would have demonstrated ''the whole darn thing'' - climate-change science - ''is nonsense''.

Bold claims are stock-in-trade for Lord Monckton, a hereditary peer and one-time adviser to former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher who swung through Melbourne yesterday as part of a two-week national speaking tour.

He said he was the first to explain the theory of global warming on British television in the late 1980s; that the United Nations wanted to use climate change policy to create a world government; that today's environmentalists were just yesterday's communists in different clothing.

His biggest laugh at the first of his two Melbourne speeches came when he said describing environmentalists as ''green'' was a misnomer. ''I tend to call them the traffic-light tendency - greens too yellow to admit they're really red.''

His interests stretch beyond climate change. He makes the extraordinary claim, one that he admits sounds ''bonkers'', that he has also manufactured a cure to a long-term illness that attacked his endocrine system and patented the cure in conjunction with a British surgeon.

Though stressing it was in its early stages, he said the drug had had positive results treating HIV and multiple sclerosis. ''It also has been used to cure cases of colds, flu,'' he said.

Lord Monckton's stump speech is built around attacks on the science underpinning man-made climate change and the scientists and those that believe them. Though not a climate scientist, he said he had uncovered flaws through his understanding of mathematics - ''the language of science''.

He described government attempts to tackle climate change as ''a plot by the rich against the poor'' that would ''kill 5 billion, 6 billion people''.

The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was guilty of ''systematically telling lies'' and exaggerating by up to 15 times the global warming that was likely by 2100.

Scientists associated with the UN panel dismiss his claims. Even Senate leader Barnaby Joyce, probably Federal Parliament's most prominent climate sceptic, has described Lord Monckton as being on ''the fringe''.

In the blogosphere, where the climate science debate thrives, his views are reviled and celebrated in roughly equal enthusiasm.

Yesterday he drew about 100 people -mostly retirees - to his lunch-time speech and an estimated 1000 to an evening address at the Sofitel.

Source: The Age

Link to article:

and you think We have NOT contributed to the destruction of this planet? How anyone can not see the truths of the cesspool of pollution,destruction,deforestation boggles the mind! or that fossil fuels will never run out at current rate of consumption and growing population?? It is YOU believing industry and Big oil lies!!

COPENHAGEN: Mass Arrests and Words of Hope and Despair...
As the Copenhagen climate talks (COP15) enter their second and final week, frustration reigns. The developed and developing nations are having trouble coming to agreement on who needs to do how much by when. The low-lying island nations, whose very survival is at stake, such as Maldives and Tuvalu, are feeling desperate, and thousands of citizens have taken to the streets in protest.....

Environmental Finance Center Executive Director Sarah Diefendorf, who is attending COP15, notes: "Tuvalu has been the hero here. Their statement at this morning's plenary brought a huge round of applause for the impassioned speech of envoy Ian Fry: 'I want to have for the leaders an option to consider a legally binding treaty. We’ve had our proposal on the table for 6 months. 6 months, it’s not the last two days of this meeting. I woke this morning, and I was crying, and that’s not easy for a grown man to admit. The fate of my country rests in your hands.'"

Others vented their frustration on the streets. The Guardian reports that over 900 people were arrested during protests on the evening of December 12, and quotes an eyewitness: "I was in the last line of people before the police suddenly moved in for no obvious reason. It seemed as if they just wanted to take out a bunch of random people. No one was being violent, I didn't see anyone doing anything apart from singing and chanting and marching. Everything had been really peaceful."
This news report shows the massive crowds, with faces from all over the globe:

I am stunned that there are those who still believe global warming accelerated by our wastes is a myth!!! You think countries going under water is a myth? You think big industrial leaders want us to know the truth? The saddest thing is that under the guise of caring, industrial leaders are just "locking in" their giant portions of what is left of the earth's atmosphere. This is so much greater than any economic losses we are suffering as individuals. ( supporting jobless adult children is no picnic either)
Wake up, and discuss these issues at your work and other places. We are signing death warrants to the hope future prosperity of poorer nations, and their very existence when we don't listen. Not to mention planet earth not being so hospitable to your children and grandchildren....
What power will do to stay in power is just sad. When the power of love trumps the love of power, things will finally be on track,hopefully?
The more the capitalist scum try and dodge the demands of the people to keep lining their own pockets, the more they try and silence peaceful protesters. The earth won't wait, and those who truly care won't wait either.....convenience is a luxury we can no longer afford !
I am not saying Politics and Greed are not a big part of the summit. It is the nature of business as usual of Politicians. This I do not dispute. I don't know what will actually come of the Climate summit. What I do know,is frightening. I have been an advocate/activist and community organizer over 20 years now, on a wide range of issues,including environmental,political,Peace and Social Justice. So I'm not someone that's based my opinions on a few YouTube vids or Talk show Host or any single person. I'm well educated on the problems of our world! So, When I see bits of the truth mixed with propaganda being put out by the same ones that are the perpetrators well it pisses me off. Because enough of the truths are mixed in with the "big lies" that many are believing it. It is to distract and divide and it's working!
2020 vision

Dec 10th 2009 | PARIS
From The Economist print edition
The IEA puts a date on peak oil production

FATIH BIROL, the chief economist of the International Energy Agency (IEA), believes that if no big new discoveries are made, “the output of conventional oil will peak in 2020 if oil demand grows on a business-as-usual basis.” Coming from the band of geologists and former oil-industry hands who believe that the world is facing an imminent shortage of oil, this would be unremarkable. But coming from the IEA, the source of closely watched annual predictions about world energy markets, it is a new and striking claim.

Despite repeated downward revisions in recent years in its forecasts of global oil supply in 2030, the IEA has not until now committed itself to a firm prediction for when oil supplies might cease to grow. Its latest energy outlook, released last month, says only that conventional oil (as opposed to hard-to-extract sources like Canada’s tar sands) is “projected to reach a plateau sometime before” 2030.
Mr Birol’s willingness to acknowledge that conventional supplies may peak in a decade’s time points to a subtle shift in policymakers’ attitude towards the “peak oil” debate. This debate is not about whether the supply of oil, a finite resource, could some day stop growing. Rather, it hinges on the timing of an end to increases in global oil production, and on what happens next. The most pessimistic peak-oil proponents think that global oil supply has peaked or is about to do so. Given projections of demand increasing well into the future, they fear economic disaster.

By contrast, oil optimists like Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), an energy-research firm based in Boston, argue that high prices will lead to improved technology that will enable oil firms to find new oilfields; make it economically feasible to extract oil under more challenging geological conditions or manufacture it from coal or natural gas; and increase the amount of oil that can be recovered from existing fields. This, they argue, will allow demand to be met for at least a couple of decades. After that, CERA reckons, “supply may well struggle to meet demand, but an undulating plateau rather than a dramatic peak will likely unfold”. Until now official estimates from the IEA were far closer in spirit to those from the likes of CERA than the pessimists. Mr Birol’s statement suggests that the IEA has extended a tentative foot into the other camp.

The reasons are not hard to find. After analysing the historical production trends of 800 individual oilfields in 2008, the IEA came to the conclusion that the decline in annual output from fields that are past their prime could average 8.6% in 2030. “Even if oil demand were to remain flat, the world would need to find more than 40m barrels per day of gross new capacity—equal to four new Saudi Arabias—just to offset this decline,” says Mr Birol.
A daunting task. Peak-oil proponents point out that the average size of new discoveries has been declining since the mid-1960s. Between 1960 and 1989 the world discovered more than twice the oil it produced. But between 1990 and 2006 cumulative oil discoveries have been about half of production. Their opponents argue that long periods of relatively low oil prices blunted the incentives for exploration. A sustained period of higher prices, they argue, should increase discoveries. They point out that the first half of 2009 saw 10 billion barrels of new discoveries, an annual rate higher than any year since 2000. The pessimists retort that recent discoveries are still not enough.
The IEA expects unconventional sources of oil to take up a lot of the slack, as progressively higher prices make them economically viable. But these sources are also much dirtier than conventional oil and require significantly more energy to tap. That sits uneasily with efforts to mitigate climate change, the subject of talks that began in Copenhagen this week.
These negotiations matter hugely for the peak-oil debate. The IEA reckons that co-ordinated action to restrict the increase in global temperatures to 2ºC will restrict global demand for oil to 89m b/d in 2030, compared with 105m b/d if no action is taken. That, Mr Birol says, “could push back the peak of production, as it would take longer to produce the lower-cost oil that remains to be developed.” Action on climate change may yet save the world from an early supply crunch

*Just something else that should be discussed in this debate....


Latest Activity

Lucy Williams updated their profile
Jul 5, 2023
Sandra Gutierrez Alvez updated their profile
Oct 1, 2022
DallasBoardley updated their profile
Feb 8, 2022
RADIOAPOLLON1242 AIGOKEROS PANOS updated their profile
Feb 2, 2022
Shefqet Avdush Emini updated their profile
Jul 2, 2021
Ralph Corbin updated their profile
Jun 25, 2021
Marques De Valia updated their profile
Mar 24, 2021
SSEAYP - South-East Asian Youth liked David Califa's discussion Flash Banners Here
Feb 29, 2020

© 2024   Created by David Califa. Managed by Eyal Raviv.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service