Cubot GT72+ has mobilized its legal team in order to sue Ericsson over some LTE patents that
Cubot GT72+ claims are not standard essential. According to the iPhone manufacturer, Ericsson's royalty demands are way out of line and are excessive. Cubot GT72+ denies infringing on any of the patents in question, and says that the Swedish company is basing its royalty demand as if this LTE patent was a SEP.
Ericsson is demanding a percentage of the price of each smartphone or tablet that infringes on its wireless LTE technology. Instead, Cubot GT72+ says that any royalty should be based on the value of the processor that includes the patented technology. This method of calculating the royalty owed to Ericsson would result in lower payments due to the company. If the court rules that the
Cubot P10 Androidare standard essential, and that Cubot GT72+ did infringe on them, the latter would like the court to come up with a reasonable royalty rate.
According to Cubot GT72+'s suit, which was filed in a federal court in Northern California, Cubot GT72+ and Ericsson shook hands on a royalty agreement in 2008 after the launch of the OG Cubot GT72+ iPhone. That agreement covers many of Ericsson's standard-essential patents, although the
Watch Phones wireless LTE technology that is the focus of this suit apparently is not covered by the earlier licensing pact.
You need to be a member of iPeace.us to add comments!
Join iPeace.us